Dear friends
I want to share with you something that came to my mind just know.
The kind of light God has given us trough our wonderful and very own star "The Sun" Is irreplaceable.
the ones that desire control over your life, (so they can keep getting rich by selling you their stuff and services) rather, to keep you entertained with another light, from the computer, from the television, from the sparkles and colors in the mall, casinos.
We work day and night every day of our life in order to be able to look at this "artificial lights, artificial colors" This are mirages!
The energy of the sun is needed in our body and mind to be complete, healthy, purified.
Do you know why people get skin cancer? is not because the rays of the sun are hurtful, is because our skin contain so many toxins and poisons because of the bad food and drugs we ingest, that when we are in contact with Sun light this makes a reaction, the sun gives energy to the cells to try to get ride of the poisons.
Why is it that people in Africa or other countries where people spend 90% of the day outdoors DON'T GET SKIN CANCER?
Now you know why.
We have to expose ourselves to nature, I am talking about wild nature, kids are becoming sick when they ingest peanuts!, what is that telling you, allergies became more and more strong when we stop avoiding nature in our body.
Generation after generation of polluting our bodies, our genetic DNA doesn’t progress or evolve, but goes backwards.
Creating a human who is wicker and sicker and the Immune system gets so corrupted and attacked by new drugs, that finally loses the fight. That is what Aids is too.
So know this, when you get a fiber or a cough or a head heck, know that is your immune system giving you a warning, don’t run to take a pill to tell your body SHUT UP!, your body is telling you that there is something wrong, and you need to find out what is it. Go to the doctors office and have them make you exams, or maybe you will find out by yourself and then avoid the things are making you sick.
We have to learn to read our body signs.
If the immune system of a person doesn’t work right, then the chances of having a chronic condition grow bigger.
Please, do this thinking in yourself and in the future generations.
We have to love this wrapping (body) to our spirit, and take good care of, because it is a blessing to be alive, and we are the only ones responsible for our own decisions.
Antihistaminic are needed in extreme cases, but we need to know that the less we use them the better.
Little by little lets try to live a more natural life, a more peaceful and healthy life.
Friday, March 19, 2010
Crop circles
The meaning of the crop circles
I personally believe after seen the crop circles, that they are messages of love and intelligence, take a look at this ones and tell me what you see?
I see HARMONY, PERFECTION, UNION, JUSTICE, see how in the crop circles allt he elements are similar and they interact with each other in a perfect way, in a magic harmony. That is what they are trying to tell us.
that we can work together like that, and they are giving us the formula.
If you get a great matematician and decifer this shapes as fractales and turn them into equations you will find intresting things.
But is so hard for the polluted human eye, to see.
http://www.floating-world.org/Symbols.htm
I personally believe after seen the crop circles, that they are messages of love and intelligence, take a look at this ones and tell me what you see?
I see HARMONY, PERFECTION, UNION, JUSTICE, see how in the crop circles allt he elements are similar and they interact with each other in a perfect way, in a magic harmony. That is what they are trying to tell us.
that we can work together like that, and they are giving us the formula.
If you get a great matematician and decifer this shapes as fractales and turn them into equations you will find intresting things.
But is so hard for the polluted human eye, to see.
http://www.floating-world.org/Symbols.htm
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Realistic Illustrations
I am sharing with you a store at cafepress of a great artist, one with a critic mind and knowledge, I like to support good causes I think this is one.
http://www.cafepress.com/dees2shop
more info about the artist http://www.deesillustration.com/
http://www.cafepress.com/dees2shop
more info about the artist http://www.deesillustration.com/
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Article Influenza "They organized Psychosis"
ORIGINAL FRENCH ARTICLE: Grippe A : « Ils ont organisé la psychose »
http://www.humaniteinenglish.com/spip.php?article1427
by Bruno Odent
Influenza A: "They Organized a Psychosis"
Translated Monday 11 January 2010, by Leslie Thatcher (www.truthout.org) and reviewed by Henry Crapo
Exposé: the president of the Council of Europe’s Health Commission, German Wolfgang Wodarg, accuses pharmaceutical lobbies and governments. He has obtained the launch of an investigation by the official body he heads on the role played by laboratories in the campaign of panic around the virus. A no-holds-barred interview.
Former member of the German Socialist Party, Wolfgang Wodarg is a physician and epidemiologist. He garnered the Council of Europe’s Health Commission members’ unanimous consent for a commission of inquiry into the role of pharmaceutical firms in the management of H1N1 flu by the WHO and by governments ...
Bruno Odent for L’Humanité: What attracted your suspicions about laboratories’ undue influence on the decisions taken with respect to influenza A?
Wolfgang Wodarg: We are faced with a failure of the great national institutions charged with alerting us to the risks and responding to them should a pandemic arise. In April, when the first alarm came from Mexico, I was very surprised by the figures the World Health Organization (WHO) was advancing to justify the proclamation of a pandemic. I had suspicions immediately: the figures were quite weak and the level of alarm very elevated. There weren’t even a thousand sick people before there was already talk of the pandemic of the century. And the extreme alert decreed was based on the fact that the virus was new. But the characteristic of flu-type illnesses is to develop very fast with viruses that take on new forms each time by moving in on new hosts - animals, people etc. There’s nothing new in that. A new "flu" virus of that kind appears every year. In reality, nothing justified sounding the alarm at that level. That was only possible because the WHO changed its definition of pandemic at the beginning of May. Before that date, it was not only necessary that the illness break out in several countries at once, but also that it have very serious consequences, with a number of mortalities in excess of the usual averages. That aspect was erased from the new definition, while the only criterion retained was that of the rate of the illness’s diffusion. And it was alleged that the virus was dangerous because populations had not been able to develop immune defenses against it. Which was false for this virus, since we had been able to observe that people over 60 already had antibodies, which is to say that they had already been in contact with analogous viruses. That’s why there were practically no people over 60 who developed the illness. Yet, they were the people it was recommended to have be rapidly vaccinated.
Among the things that aroused my suspicions then, there was on the one hand, that desire to sound the alarm - and on the other, very curious facts. Such as, for example, the WHO’s recommendation to perform two injections for the vaccinations. That had never been the case before. There was no scientific justification for it. There was also this recommendation to use only specific patented vaccines. Yet, no reason existed for not adding - as is done every year - specific anti-viral particles of this new H1N1 virus, thus "completing" seasonal flu vaccines. That wasn’t done because it was preferred to use patented vaccine material that the big laboratories had elaborated and manufactured to hold in readiness should a pandemic develop. And by proceeding in this fashion, they did not hesitate to put vaccinated persons in danger.
What danger?
Wolfgang Wodarg: To make products quickly available, additives were used in some vaccines the effects of which had not be adequately tested. In other words: people absolutely wanted to use these new patented products instead of perfecting vaccines according to much simpler, more trustworthy and less costly traditional methods of manufacture. There was no medical reason for that - solely marketing reasons.
How were they able to justify that?
Wolfgang Wodarg: In order to understand, we must go back to the avian flu episode of 2005 - 2006. It was on that occasion that the new international plans designed to confront a pandemic alert were mapped out. Officially, those plans were elaborated to guarantee rapid manufacture of vaccine in the event of an alert. That gave rise to negotiations between the pharmaceutical firms and governments. On the one hand, the laboratories committed to hold themselves ready to develop preparations; on the other hand, governments assured the companies that they would really buy all that from them. Pursuant to this phony deal, the pharmaceutical industry took no economic risk by committing to new manufactures. And it was assured of hitting the jackpot should a pandemic break out.
You contest the established diagnoses and the seriousness, even the potential seriousness, of influenza A?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Yes, it’s an altogether normal flu. It occasions only a tenth of the deaths caused by classic seasonal flu. All that mattered and all that led to the extraordinary campaign of panic we have witnessed is that it constituted a golden opportunity for lab reps who knew they’d make a mint should a pandemic be proclaimed.
These are very serious accusations you’re making. How was such a process within the heart of the World Health Organization made possible?
Wolfgang Wodarg: A group of people at the WHO is very tightly associated with the pharmaceutical industry.
The Council of Europe’s inquiry will also work in this direction?
Wolfgang Wodarg: We want to shed light on everything that could have yielded this incredible propaganda campaign. We want to know who decided on the basis of what scientific evidence and exactly how the pharmaceutical industry’s influence was exerted in the decision making. And we must ultimately present our claims to the governments. The objective of the commission of inquiry is to assure there be no more false alarms of this type in the future, to assure that the population may rely on the analysis and the expertise of national and international public institutions. Today, those institutions are discredited because millions of people have been vaccinated with products that present possible risks to their health. That was not necessary. Also, that all led to a significant waste of public money.
Do you have concrete numbers on the scope of that waste?
Wolfgang Wodarg: In Germany, it was 700 million euros. But it’s very difficult to know the precise figures because on the one hand people are talking about the resale of vaccines to foreign countries and especially because - in the name of the principle of respect for "business secrets" - companies do not communicate the amounts in contracts signed with governments and the possible compensation clauses that figure within them.
Will the Council of Europe investigation also deal with the labs’ lobbying of the national institutes of health?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Yes, we shall study the attitude of the institutes, such as the Robert Koch in Germany, or the Pasteur in France, that really should have advised their governments in a critical manner. In some countries, the institutes did just that. In Finland or Poland, for example, critical voices were raised to say: "We don’t need that."
Wasn’t the incredible planetary propaganda operation possible also because the pharmaceutical industry had "its representative" right inside the governments of the most powerful countries?
Wolfgang Wodarg: In the ministries, that seems obvious to me. I cannot fathom how specialists, highly intelligent people who know the problem of influenza illnesses by heart, didn’t notice what was going on.
What happened, then?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Without going so far as direct corruption, which I am certain does exist, there were a thousand ways for the labs to exert their influence over decisions. I have been able to establish very concretely, for example, how Klaus Stöhr, who was head of the epidemiological department at the WHO during the era of the avian flu, and who, therefore, prepared the plans designed to confront a pandemic that I mentioned earlier, became, in the meantime, a senior executive at Novartis. And similar connections exist between Glaxo, Baxter etc. and influential members of the WHO. These big firms had "their people" in the system and managed things afterwards so that the "right" political decisions were made, that is, the decisions that allowed them to pump the maximum amount of money out of the taxpayers.
But if your investigation succeeds, won’t it be a prop for citizens to require that their governments demand an accounting from these big groups?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Yes, you are right; it’s one of the big issues connected with this investigation. Governments could, in fact, refer to the investigation to contest contracts signed under, let us say, not very clean conditions. If it can be proved that it was the firms’ undue influence that led to the onset of the process, then we must push governments until they demand to be reimbursed. But that’s solely on the financial side; there’s also the human side - that of people vaccinated with inadequately tested products.
What sort of risk did they unknowingly take then, these people in good health who had themselves vaccinated?
Wolfgang Wodarg: I repeat that the vaccines were developed too quickly, some additives inadequately tested. But there are more serious problems. The vaccine developed by Novartis was produced in a bioreactor from cancerous cells, a technique never used before now.
Obviously, I’m not a specialist, but how can someone make a vaccine from sick cells?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Normally, chicken eggs are used as the medium in which the viruses are grown. It’s necessary, in fact, to work with live cells, since the virus can multiply in that way only and consequently, by definition, the anti-viral preparations that go with them. But that procedure presents a major flaw; it’s slow; it requires many eggs. And it is long and complex on a technical level. Another technique with remarkable potential consists of growing the viruses on living cells in bioreactors. Cells that grow and divide very quickly are required for that. That’s approximately the procedure that is used to culture yogurt, which is also made in bioreactors, but in this context the cell has been so disrupted in its environment and its growth that it grows like a cancerous cell. And it’s on those high-yield cells that the virus is cultivated. Only to manufacture the vaccine, it is necessary to extract the viruses from those cells into which they have been implanted. And. consequently, it may happen that during the process of manufacturing the vaccine, residues from the cancerous cell remain in the preparation, as happens in the classic manufacture with eggs. So, we know that in the case of a vaccination against classic flu, secondary effects may appear in people allergic to the egg albumin found in egg whites. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that protein remains of a cancerous cell present in a vaccine manufactured in a bioreactor give rise to a tumor in the vaccinated person. According to the true precautionary principle, therefore, it should have been necessary before such a product be authorized for commercial use to be 100 percent certain that such effects are actually out of the question.
And that wasn’t done?
Wolfgang Wodarg: That was not done. The EMA (European Medicines Agency), an institution based in London under the responsibility of the European Commissioner for the Economy, which gives the authorizations for putting vaccines on the market in Europe, gave its green light for the commercialization of this product, arguing, that, in this case, this manufacturing method did not constitute a "significant" risk. That was evaluated quite differently by numerous specialists here in Germany and by an independent medicine institution: they, on the contrary, raised the alarm and communicated their objections. I took those warnings seriously. I studied the file and intervened within the framework of the Bundestag Health Committee, to which I then belonged, so that the vaccine not be used in Germany. I made it known that I was certainly not opposed to the development of vaccines using that technique, but that it was first of all necessary to guarantee total harmlessness. So, the product was not used in Germany where the government rescinded the contract with Novartis.
What is the name of this vaccine?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Obta flu.
But that means that in other European countries such as France the product may be sold without any problem?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Yes, it obtained EMA authorization and may consequently be used throughout the European Union.
What alternative do you intend to promote so that we escape new scandals of this kind?
Wolfgang Wodarg: The WHO should have to be more transparent so that we clearly know who decides and what kind of relationship exists between the participants in the organization. It would also be appropriate that the WHO at least be supported by an elected chamber, able to react very critically and in which everyone is free to express themselves. This strengthening of public control is indispensable.
But isn’t the issue one of another system able to handle a question that in fact relates to the common welfare of all citizens of the planet?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Can we continue to leave the production of vaccines and the conduct of that production to organizations, the objective of which is to earn the most money possible? Or is not the production of vaccines a public domain issue par excellence that governments must control and implement themselves? That’s why I think we must abandon the system of patents for vaccines, that is to say, the possibility of some big group monopolizing vaccine production. For that possibility presupposes the sacrifice of thousands of human lives, simply in the name of respect for those monopolistic rights. You are right, that particular demand has taken on - for me, in any case - the aspect of an obvious fact.
http://www.humaniteinenglish.com/spip.php?article1427
by Bruno Odent
Influenza A: "They Organized a Psychosis"
Translated Monday 11 January 2010, by Leslie Thatcher (www.truthout.org) and reviewed by Henry Crapo
Exposé: the president of the Council of Europe’s Health Commission, German Wolfgang Wodarg, accuses pharmaceutical lobbies and governments. He has obtained the launch of an investigation by the official body he heads on the role played by laboratories in the campaign of panic around the virus. A no-holds-barred interview.
Former member of the German Socialist Party, Wolfgang Wodarg is a physician and epidemiologist. He garnered the Council of Europe’s Health Commission members’ unanimous consent for a commission of inquiry into the role of pharmaceutical firms in the management of H1N1 flu by the WHO and by governments ...
Bruno Odent for L’Humanité: What attracted your suspicions about laboratories’ undue influence on the decisions taken with respect to influenza A?
Wolfgang Wodarg: We are faced with a failure of the great national institutions charged with alerting us to the risks and responding to them should a pandemic arise. In April, when the first alarm came from Mexico, I was very surprised by the figures the World Health Organization (WHO) was advancing to justify the proclamation of a pandemic. I had suspicions immediately: the figures were quite weak and the level of alarm very elevated. There weren’t even a thousand sick people before there was already talk of the pandemic of the century. And the extreme alert decreed was based on the fact that the virus was new. But the characteristic of flu-type illnesses is to develop very fast with viruses that take on new forms each time by moving in on new hosts - animals, people etc. There’s nothing new in that. A new "flu" virus of that kind appears every year. In reality, nothing justified sounding the alarm at that level. That was only possible because the WHO changed its definition of pandemic at the beginning of May. Before that date, it was not only necessary that the illness break out in several countries at once, but also that it have very serious consequences, with a number of mortalities in excess of the usual averages. That aspect was erased from the new definition, while the only criterion retained was that of the rate of the illness’s diffusion. And it was alleged that the virus was dangerous because populations had not been able to develop immune defenses against it. Which was false for this virus, since we had been able to observe that people over 60 already had antibodies, which is to say that they had already been in contact with analogous viruses. That’s why there were practically no people over 60 who developed the illness. Yet, they were the people it was recommended to have be rapidly vaccinated.
Among the things that aroused my suspicions then, there was on the one hand, that desire to sound the alarm - and on the other, very curious facts. Such as, for example, the WHO’s recommendation to perform two injections for the vaccinations. That had never been the case before. There was no scientific justification for it. There was also this recommendation to use only specific patented vaccines. Yet, no reason existed for not adding - as is done every year - specific anti-viral particles of this new H1N1 virus, thus "completing" seasonal flu vaccines. That wasn’t done because it was preferred to use patented vaccine material that the big laboratories had elaborated and manufactured to hold in readiness should a pandemic develop. And by proceeding in this fashion, they did not hesitate to put vaccinated persons in danger.
What danger?
Wolfgang Wodarg: To make products quickly available, additives were used in some vaccines the effects of which had not be adequately tested. In other words: people absolutely wanted to use these new patented products instead of perfecting vaccines according to much simpler, more trustworthy and less costly traditional methods of manufacture. There was no medical reason for that - solely marketing reasons.
How were they able to justify that?
Wolfgang Wodarg: In order to understand, we must go back to the avian flu episode of 2005 - 2006. It was on that occasion that the new international plans designed to confront a pandemic alert were mapped out. Officially, those plans were elaborated to guarantee rapid manufacture of vaccine in the event of an alert. That gave rise to negotiations between the pharmaceutical firms and governments. On the one hand, the laboratories committed to hold themselves ready to develop preparations; on the other hand, governments assured the companies that they would really buy all that from them. Pursuant to this phony deal, the pharmaceutical industry took no economic risk by committing to new manufactures. And it was assured of hitting the jackpot should a pandemic break out.
You contest the established diagnoses and the seriousness, even the potential seriousness, of influenza A?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Yes, it’s an altogether normal flu. It occasions only a tenth of the deaths caused by classic seasonal flu. All that mattered and all that led to the extraordinary campaign of panic we have witnessed is that it constituted a golden opportunity for lab reps who knew they’d make a mint should a pandemic be proclaimed.
These are very serious accusations you’re making. How was such a process within the heart of the World Health Organization made possible?
Wolfgang Wodarg: A group of people at the WHO is very tightly associated with the pharmaceutical industry.
The Council of Europe’s inquiry will also work in this direction?
Wolfgang Wodarg: We want to shed light on everything that could have yielded this incredible propaganda campaign. We want to know who decided on the basis of what scientific evidence and exactly how the pharmaceutical industry’s influence was exerted in the decision making. And we must ultimately present our claims to the governments. The objective of the commission of inquiry is to assure there be no more false alarms of this type in the future, to assure that the population may rely on the analysis and the expertise of national and international public institutions. Today, those institutions are discredited because millions of people have been vaccinated with products that present possible risks to their health. That was not necessary. Also, that all led to a significant waste of public money.
Do you have concrete numbers on the scope of that waste?
Wolfgang Wodarg: In Germany, it was 700 million euros. But it’s very difficult to know the precise figures because on the one hand people are talking about the resale of vaccines to foreign countries and especially because - in the name of the principle of respect for "business secrets" - companies do not communicate the amounts in contracts signed with governments and the possible compensation clauses that figure within them.
Will the Council of Europe investigation also deal with the labs’ lobbying of the national institutes of health?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Yes, we shall study the attitude of the institutes, such as the Robert Koch in Germany, or the Pasteur in France, that really should have advised their governments in a critical manner. In some countries, the institutes did just that. In Finland or Poland, for example, critical voices were raised to say: "We don’t need that."
Wasn’t the incredible planetary propaganda operation possible also because the pharmaceutical industry had "its representative" right inside the governments of the most powerful countries?
Wolfgang Wodarg: In the ministries, that seems obvious to me. I cannot fathom how specialists, highly intelligent people who know the problem of influenza illnesses by heart, didn’t notice what was going on.
What happened, then?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Without going so far as direct corruption, which I am certain does exist, there were a thousand ways for the labs to exert their influence over decisions. I have been able to establish very concretely, for example, how Klaus Stöhr, who was head of the epidemiological department at the WHO during the era of the avian flu, and who, therefore, prepared the plans designed to confront a pandemic that I mentioned earlier, became, in the meantime, a senior executive at Novartis. And similar connections exist between Glaxo, Baxter etc. and influential members of the WHO. These big firms had "their people" in the system and managed things afterwards so that the "right" political decisions were made, that is, the decisions that allowed them to pump the maximum amount of money out of the taxpayers.
But if your investigation succeeds, won’t it be a prop for citizens to require that their governments demand an accounting from these big groups?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Yes, you are right; it’s one of the big issues connected with this investigation. Governments could, in fact, refer to the investigation to contest contracts signed under, let us say, not very clean conditions. If it can be proved that it was the firms’ undue influence that led to the onset of the process, then we must push governments until they demand to be reimbursed. But that’s solely on the financial side; there’s also the human side - that of people vaccinated with inadequately tested products.
What sort of risk did they unknowingly take then, these people in good health who had themselves vaccinated?
Wolfgang Wodarg: I repeat that the vaccines were developed too quickly, some additives inadequately tested. But there are more serious problems. The vaccine developed by Novartis was produced in a bioreactor from cancerous cells, a technique never used before now.
Obviously, I’m not a specialist, but how can someone make a vaccine from sick cells?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Normally, chicken eggs are used as the medium in which the viruses are grown. It’s necessary, in fact, to work with live cells, since the virus can multiply in that way only and consequently, by definition, the anti-viral preparations that go with them. But that procedure presents a major flaw; it’s slow; it requires many eggs. And it is long and complex on a technical level. Another technique with remarkable potential consists of growing the viruses on living cells in bioreactors. Cells that grow and divide very quickly are required for that. That’s approximately the procedure that is used to culture yogurt, which is also made in bioreactors, but in this context the cell has been so disrupted in its environment and its growth that it grows like a cancerous cell. And it’s on those high-yield cells that the virus is cultivated. Only to manufacture the vaccine, it is necessary to extract the viruses from those cells into which they have been implanted. And. consequently, it may happen that during the process of manufacturing the vaccine, residues from the cancerous cell remain in the preparation, as happens in the classic manufacture with eggs. So, we know that in the case of a vaccination against classic flu, secondary effects may appear in people allergic to the egg albumin found in egg whites. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that protein remains of a cancerous cell present in a vaccine manufactured in a bioreactor give rise to a tumor in the vaccinated person. According to the true precautionary principle, therefore, it should have been necessary before such a product be authorized for commercial use to be 100 percent certain that such effects are actually out of the question.
And that wasn’t done?
Wolfgang Wodarg: That was not done. The EMA (European Medicines Agency), an institution based in London under the responsibility of the European Commissioner for the Economy, which gives the authorizations for putting vaccines on the market in Europe, gave its green light for the commercialization of this product, arguing, that, in this case, this manufacturing method did not constitute a "significant" risk. That was evaluated quite differently by numerous specialists here in Germany and by an independent medicine institution: they, on the contrary, raised the alarm and communicated their objections. I took those warnings seriously. I studied the file and intervened within the framework of the Bundestag Health Committee, to which I then belonged, so that the vaccine not be used in Germany. I made it known that I was certainly not opposed to the development of vaccines using that technique, but that it was first of all necessary to guarantee total harmlessness. So, the product was not used in Germany where the government rescinded the contract with Novartis.
What is the name of this vaccine?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Obta flu.
But that means that in other European countries such as France the product may be sold without any problem?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Yes, it obtained EMA authorization and may consequently be used throughout the European Union.
What alternative do you intend to promote so that we escape new scandals of this kind?
Wolfgang Wodarg: The WHO should have to be more transparent so that we clearly know who decides and what kind of relationship exists between the participants in the organization. It would also be appropriate that the WHO at least be supported by an elected chamber, able to react very critically and in which everyone is free to express themselves. This strengthening of public control is indispensable.
But isn’t the issue one of another system able to handle a question that in fact relates to the common welfare of all citizens of the planet?
Wolfgang Wodarg: Can we continue to leave the production of vaccines and the conduct of that production to organizations, the objective of which is to earn the most money possible? Or is not the production of vaccines a public domain issue par excellence that governments must control and implement themselves? That’s why I think we must abandon the system of patents for vaccines, that is to say, the possibility of some big group monopolizing vaccine production. For that possibility presupposes the sacrifice of thousands of human lives, simply in the name of respect for those monopolistic rights. You are right, that particular demand has taken on - for me, in any case - the aspect of an obvious fact.
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Guardacil May prevent CC, and May Kill You.
Cervical cancer is a cancer that you could have, but the chances are 1 in millions that you would get it, is not worth going trought a serious of symptoms and sickness as rash, pain in joyns, lack of circulation, get a autoinmmune disease because you get a vaccine of Guardacil, a vaccine that "MAY" protect you from cervical cancer that actually is administrated in young girls 8 million girls or more had been vaccinated,
8000 girls in the US after they get the shot they collaps, faint, trow up, some get paralized, a girl that take 3 shots of guardacil die after the third dose.
Merck and CDC said is safe oviously.
The secondary effects are not wroth it!
Please, protect your children form this evil and ambisious unhearted people and companies, is ovious that farmaceuticals are not working for our health, but for our Illness so they can Sell us something, or worst... control population in the sickest way.
This is my theory but there is proves out there, get informed please.
The truth will make you free, don't forget about it.
This video is in spanish and english please watch it and make your own research.
I have a sister who is a Doctor in central America, she is a great halopatic Doctor, she mention how some doctors have sell their souls to pharmaceutics to sell and administrate drugs to patients that were not beneficial and in some cases worst because this drugs were also sickening the patient more!
She did her research in the hospital floor, 40 patients, same sickness more or less, she noticed they were all getting a specific drug, and the drug was not doing what it was suposed to do, then whe start her cientific research and all she did is avoid giving that drug to all the patients..........conclusion ... All the patients within a week start improving their health, when she present her article to discussion in the hospital, every doctor congratulate her for her findings... Then she try to find out why this drug was not working as it should and why this drug was administrated to All the patients even when they had some diferences. She was about to contact the pharmaceutical company to ask questions.. guess what happen?, The other doctores told her, Stop investigating, We live from the pharmaceuticals, the hospital lives from the pharmaceutical companies don't even think about it.
She was in rotation, so she sadly left and could not do anything, every hospital is alike,
Doctors are not bad, they learn what they are teach, from books, and you have to understand that most of the books and articles are also given the chance to be because of the pharmaceutics.
Not all drugs are bad, some are usefull, some are needed, antibiotics are marvelous, cirgury when needed is amazing, but as everywhere corruption enters and who pays the bill?... We do, with our life.
http://www.megavideo.com/?v=110EUVFI
8000 girls in the US after they get the shot they collaps, faint, trow up, some get paralized, a girl that take 3 shots of guardacil die after the third dose.
Merck and CDC said is safe oviously.
The secondary effects are not wroth it!
Please, protect your children form this evil and ambisious unhearted people and companies, is ovious that farmaceuticals are not working for our health, but for our Illness so they can Sell us something, or worst... control population in the sickest way.
This is my theory but there is proves out there, get informed please.
The truth will make you free, don't forget about it.
This video is in spanish and english please watch it and make your own research.
I have a sister who is a Doctor in central America, she is a great halopatic Doctor, she mention how some doctors have sell their souls to pharmaceutics to sell and administrate drugs to patients that were not beneficial and in some cases worst because this drugs were also sickening the patient more!
She did her research in the hospital floor, 40 patients, same sickness more or less, she noticed they were all getting a specific drug, and the drug was not doing what it was suposed to do, then whe start her cientific research and all she did is avoid giving that drug to all the patients..........conclusion ... All the patients within a week start improving their health, when she present her article to discussion in the hospital, every doctor congratulate her for her findings... Then she try to find out why this drug was not working as it should and why this drug was administrated to All the patients even when they had some diferences. She was about to contact the pharmaceutical company to ask questions.. guess what happen?, The other doctores told her, Stop investigating, We live from the pharmaceuticals, the hospital lives from the pharmaceutical companies don't even think about it.
She was in rotation, so she sadly left and could not do anything, every hospital is alike,
Doctors are not bad, they learn what they are teach, from books, and you have to understand that most of the books and articles are also given the chance to be because of the pharmaceutics.
Not all drugs are bad, some are usefull, some are needed, antibiotics are marvelous, cirgury when needed is amazing, but as everywhere corruption enters and who pays the bill?... We do, with our life.
http://www.megavideo.com/?v=110EUVFI
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
Monday, January 11, 2010
Divine Teachings from our Master Jesus.
No need to be perfect to follow God,
In the ancient times Kings apointed by the Prophets of God were not perfect,
yet they try and try to keep themselves faithfull to His Word and Commandments.
Falling is the first step of standing up again, failing is the first step to get it right.
May the Light of God shine upon our Hearts and the Heart of our Government
Because clear is that with out Him among us, there is not future for a Nation.
May we follow in our Dear Master Jesus footsteps who was perfect and He is,
He came to walk in this Earth
to show us the path to our Father God Yahve.
In the ancient times Kings apointed by the Prophets of God were not perfect,
yet they try and try to keep themselves faithfull to His Word and Commandments.
Falling is the first step of standing up again, failing is the first step to get it right.
May the Light of God shine upon our Hearts and the Heart of our Government
Because clear is that with out Him among us, there is not future for a Nation.
May we follow in our Dear Master Jesus footsteps who was perfect and He is,
He came to walk in this Earth
to show us the path to our Father God Yahve.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
